Pixalate Unveils Mobile Seller Trust Index 2.0: First Independent SSP Rankings on Arbitrage vs. Publisher-Direct; Rates 200+ Mobile Ad Sellers (SSPs) Across 100+ Markets, Finds 26% of SSPs Are Primarily Arbitrageurs in U.S. in Q4 2025

GlobeNewswire | Pixalate
Today at 5:07pm UTC

LONDON, April 01, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pixalate, an ad fraud and privacy compliance platform, today released the Mobile Seller Trust Index (STI) 2.0. STI 2.0 provides a leap in measurement capability that fully differentiates between arbitraged vs. authorized publisher-direct inventory for 200+ open programmatic mobile app sellers across 100+ markets. The index is free, public, and updated quarterly.

Historically, buyers have had no independent way to benchmark which sellers actually deliver direct inventory at scale across markets, and which add to the “tech tax” as resellers. Supply Path Optimization was supposed to solve this, but buyers have lacked the tools to identify which sellers are primarily reselling inventory (arbitraging).

“Buyers want to be one hop from the publisher at scale,” said Jalal Nasir, CEO of Pixalate. “Now they can see, seller by seller and market by market, who actually holds direct publisher relationships and who is adding hops.”

The STI 2.0 gives buyers that data. For each seller in each country, the model measures:

  • What Sellers Claim: How many publishers selling ads list the seller as DIRECT in their app-ads.txt file, as detected by Pixalate
  • Verification of Seller Claims: The scale and ratio of a seller’s impressions that actually flowed through an authorized-direct path, per Pixalate’s SupplyChain Object (SCO) analysis
  • Seller Arbitrage Risk: Independent Pixalate risk rating for selling >50% of inventory as a reseller, according to Pixalate’s SCO analysis

Mobile Seller Trust Index 2.0 Metrics

The following metrics are disclosed for each seller in each country:

MetricDescription
Arbitraged Inventory RatioThe percentage of a seller’s measured impressions that did not flow through an authorized-direct path — i.e., the share sold as a reseller or arbitrage intermediary, per Pixalate’s SCO analysis.
‘DIRECT’ Publisher PenetrationThe number of apps with open programmatic ad activity, as measured by Pixalate, in a country that lists the seller as a DIRECT partner in their app-ads.txt file — a measure of potential direct access in a given market.
SIVT RatioSophisticated Invalid Traffic as a percentage of total impressions, per Pixalate’s MRC-accredited detection.
GIVT RatioGeneral Invalid Traffic as a percentage of total impressions. Includes known bots, spiders, and other non-human traffic identified through industry-standard filtration lists.
Delisted App Traffic RatioThe percentage of a seller’s ads sold on apps that have been removed from the official Google Play Store and/or Apple App Store.
MFA App Traffic RatioThe percentage of a seller’s ads sold on apps that are flagged as likely Made-For-Advertising (MFA), according to Pixalate.
  

Seller overall rankings are a composite score based on Arbitraged Inventory Ratio, DIRECT Publisher Penetration, and Authorized-Direct Volume.

Mobile Arbitrage by Country: Percentage of SSPs That Are Primarily Resellers

The following table shows the share of mobile app SSPs operating in each country that are primarily resellers — meaning over half of their measured impressions were not delivered through an authorized-direct path, as assessed by Pixalate

Country# of SSPs Ranked on Mobile STI# of SSPs Ranked With >50% Arbitraged Inventory Ratio% of SSPs Ranked With >50% Arbitraged Inventory Ratio
Japan652742%
Australia461839%
Mexico672639%
Netherlands391538%
South Korea863338%
Singapore421638%
Turkey461737%
Italy612236%
Germany843036%
United Kingdom782735%
France702434%
Spain581933%
Brazil802633%
Canada933032%
India421229%
United States2025326%
    

Mobile SSP Reseller Breakdown

The following table shows major mobile app SSPs sorted by the percentage of countries in which they operate primarily (>50% of traffic) as a reseller, according to Pixalate’s SCO analysis.

Seller# of Countries Ranked on Mobile STI# of Countries With >50% Arbitraged Inventory Ratio% of Countries With >50% Arbitraged Inventory Ratio
Emodo4646100%
e-Planning3535100%
Blasto3232100%
Orange Click Media2828100%
Eskimi2121100%
Opera Ads1919100%
Magnite1111100%
Motorik1111100%
Typea Holdings Ltd.66100%
Myfeature22100%
Brave Inc605795%
TaurusX353394%
LoopMe847893%
Equativ312787%
SHAREit282382%
Between Exchange211781%
Sovrn262181%
Index Exchange413278%
OpenX392872%
Nexxen261869%
zMaticoo281968%
SMARTYADS LLP201365%
VideoHeroes392564%
PubMatic512957%
Adman Media211152%
Criteo Commerce Grid442352%
TopOn854452%
Admixer291345%
Luna Media22732%
TripleLift Inc.411229%
Ignitemedia24729%
Flat Ads33618%
Media.Net33412%
LimpidTV10110%
Bluesea2528%
Display.Io2628%
Adview4736%
Verve9866%
Bidmachine8911%
InMobi9711%
Liftoff9400%
Google AdExchange8200%
Gadsme7600%
Digital Turbine7500%
Mintegral7500%
Unity Technologies7400%
Algorix7000%
Applovin6000%
Nimbus5600%
Amazon Publisher Services5500%
BIGO Ads4500%
IronSource4100%
Pangle Global3800%
Yandex3300%
Chartboost3200%
Bidscube2800%
Ogury2100%
Anzu2000%
Taboola1100%
Outbrain Inc.600%
MobileFuse LLC600%
Odeeo600%
    

Q4 2025 Mobile Seller Trust Index: Top 5 Sellers in Select Countries

The following tables show the top-ranked sellers in select countries based on Mobile Seller Trust Index scores for Q4 2025. Full rankings for 100+ countries are available at pixalate.com.

United States

RankSellerRisksArbitraged inventory Ratio‘DIRECT’ Publisher PenetrationSIVT RatioGIVT RatioDelisted App Traffic RatioMFA App Traffic Ratio
1Google AdExchangeHigh SIVT, High GIVT< 1%23,09829%4%3%3%
2ApplovinHigh SIVT0%18,42824%2%15%< 1%
3InMobi 1%17,95415%< 1%4%< 1%
4MintegralHigh SIVT< 1%15,44218%< 1%13%< 1%
5Digital TurbineHigh SIVT0%14,96319%< 1%4%< 1%
         

Canada

RankSellerRisksArbitraged Inventory Ratio‘DIRECT’ Publisher PenetrationSIVT RatioGIVT RatioDelisted App Traffic RatioMFA App Traffic Ratio
1VerveHigh SIVT4%6,71013%< 1%28%< 1%
2Google AdExchangeHigh SIVT< 1%8,64116%1%1%< 1%
3LiftoffHigh SIVT< 1%6,92023%1%6%< 1%
4Digital TurbineHigh SIVT< 1%6,47214%< 1%2%< 1%
5Unity Technologies < 1%7,0739%< 1%3%< 1%
         

Germany

RankSellerRisksArbitraged inventory Ratio‘DIRECT’ Publisher PenetrationSIVT RatioGIVT RatioDelisted App Traffic RatioMFA App Traffic Ratio
1Google AdExchangeHigh SIVT, High GIVT3%10,01018%11%1%2%
2InMobi 2%8,12612%1%2%< 1%
3Digital Turbine < 1%7,45811%1%2%< 1%
4Bidmachine 3%5,69910%1%5%< 1%
5LiftoffHigh SIVT, High GIVT< 1%7,95337%6%5%< 1%
         

Singapore

RankSellerRisksArbitraged inventory Ratio‘DIRECT’ Publisher PenetrationSIVT RatioGIVT RatioDelisted App Traffic RatioMFA App Traffic Ratio
1VerveHigh SIVT, High GIVT3%3,75236%5%15%< 1%
2Google AdExchangeHigh SIVT, High GIVT3%4,91147%7%2%4%
3Digital TurbineHigh SIVT< 1%3,49526%1%4%< 1%
4LiftoffHigh SIVT, High GIVT0%3,80854%12%7%< 1%
5Pangle GlobalHigh SIVT0%3,35529%1%6%< 1%
         

How to Access the Mobile Seller Trust Index

The Pixalate Seller Trust Index ratings are free and open to the public. See the full Q4 2025 Mobile Seller Trust Index ratings at pixalate.com.

Pixalate also publishes the Web Seller Trust Index and CTV Seller Trust Index.

About Pixalate

Pixalate is a global platform specializing in privacy compliance, ad fraud prevention, and digital ad supply chain data intelligence. Founded in 2012 and recognized by UNICEF as a “key innovator” for children’s online privacy, Pixalate is trusted by regulators, data researchers, advertisers, publishers, ad tech platforms, and financial analysts across the Connected TV (CTV), mobile app, and website ecosystems. Pixalate is accredited by the MRC for the detection and filtration of Sophisticated Invalid Traffic (SIVT). pixalate.com

Disclaimer

The content of this press release, and the Seller Trust Indexes (collectively, the “Indexes”), reflect Pixalate’s opinions with respect to factors that Pixalate believes may be useful to the digital media industry. As cited in the Indexes, the ratings and rankings in the Indexes are based on a number of metrics and Pixalate’s opinions regarding the relative performance of each seller with respect to the metrics. The data is derived from buy-side, predominantly open auction, programmatic advertising transactions, as measured by Pixalate. Any references to outside sources in the Indexes and herein should not be construed as endorsements. Pixalate’s opinions are just that, opinions, which means that they are neither facts nor guarantees; and neither this press release nor the Indexes are intended to impugn the standing or reputation of any person, entity or app.

IVT rates and scores derived from each vendor’s own proprietary methods and independent analysis may depict differing results and opinions across measurement providers. Any party’s reliance on Pixalate’s Indexes, rankings, IVT opinions, or related data is entirely at that party’s own risk. Pixalate makes no guarantees, representations, or warranties — express or implied — regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of its opinions or data to any particular purpose or circumstance.

Per the MRC, “‘Fraud’ is not intended to represent fraud as defined in various laws, statutes and ordinances or as conventionally used in U.S. Court or other legal proceedings, but rather a custom definition strictly for advertising measurement purposes. Also per the MRC, “‘Invalid Traffic’ is defined generally as traffic that does not meet certain ad serving quality or completeness criteria, or otherwise does not represent legitimate ad traffic that should be included in measurement counts. Among the reasons why ad traffic may be deemed invalid is it is a result of non-human traffic (spiders, bots, etc.), or activity designed to produce fraudulent traffic.”


press@pixalate.com

Primary Logo